
acura nsx 1989 2005 001

Next-gen NSX to compete directly with Ferrari on performance
Enlarge PhotoHonda's NSX replacement has had several
false starts, with the company
scrapping the car's design after the public's largely negative response to its
Acura Advanced Sports Car Concept, shown at 2007's Detroit Auto Show. Beyond the styling difficulties, ensuring the car will compete successfully with Lexus's LF-A, Nissan's GT-R, and Ferrari and Lamborghini's sport-focused offerings is also taking time. But the company is sure it will do so, and the target date is 2010.
Speaking with
MotorAuthority, Acura spokesman Mike Spencer confirmed several details of the upcoming NSX replacement. The car will definitely be powered by a V10 engine, and it will be equipped with the company's SH-AWD system. There has been some discussion of a possible
four-wheel steering system (4WS) for the NSX replacement, but Spencer suggested the SH-AWD system would achieve most of the benefits of 4WS without the added complexity.
The original NSX was a mid-engine, rear-wheel drive V6-powered car, so the replacement will share little in common with it from a technical point of view. The replacement is also unlikely to share the NSX name - Spencer referred to it only as the ‘NSX replacement.’
Pricing of the NSX replacement will also be a bit different than the original. The low price of the NSX - $60,000 in the U.S. on its 1990 debut, rising to just below $100,000 by the end of its model run in 2005 - will no longer be so low.
The NSX replacement's primary competition at Ferrari and
Lamborghini will come most likely in the form of the F430 and
Gallardo, respectively. Spencer said the new NSX would be priced to compete with them, but did not give a specific dollar figure.
Pricing the NSX's replacement at effectively double the price of the last model means Honda/Acura is positioning the car as a direct competitor to Europe's elite supercars - not a budget alternative.
Nissan's GT-R is priced to fit into the latter category, although its 2+2 seating configuration and hefty dimensions take it out of direct competition with lightweight two-seaters anyway. Lexus's LF-A supercar is perhaps a more direct competitor for the NSX replacement and its European counterparts, and rumors of its pricing range from just over $100,000 to nearer the $170,000 mark, tending to confirm that Nissan's GT-R isn't the LF-A's target, either.
When it debuted in 1990, Honda's NSX was hailed by many as one of the best performance cars ever to come out of Japan, and it equaled several of the established European
sports cars of the day, including Ferrari’s 348. Its use of high-tech materials and design would set the standard for the next decade.
Although the original car’s 5.2 second 0-60mph time and 13.3 second quarter-mile time would qualify it more as a sports car than a supercar by today’s standards - Nissan’s latest 350Z posts similar numbers, and the standard Corvette coupe beats both figures by at least 0.4 seconds - the updated replacement is shaping up to be a purebred supercar, with a price to match.
Update: We originally reported that the NSX would be priced close to the Ferrari F430, however this has been denied by Acura and no dollar figure was given. Acura NSX 1989-2005Acura NSX 1989 to 2005
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!
By Stephen Posted: 4/30/2008 1:22pm PDT
By Rodan Posted: 4/30/2008 2:16pm PDT
Altho they really should fix some of their other problems first ...
By Gus Posted: 4/30/2008 2:43pm PDT
The appeal of the Japanese (and the Corvette) sports cars is that they keep up with and even beat the supercars for much less money, and with better reliability.
They should focus on that strength, as Nissan has with the GTR, Mistubishi with the Evo, Chevrolet with the Corvette.
Ferrari doesn't make Accords, Lamborghini has no Odyssey, and Honda should make a car for the guy who drives a Pilot and now has a big bonus check and wants something from his beloved car company that really gets his blood going...
By Ivan Posted: 4/30/2008 2:45pm PDT
By Ayax Posted: 4/30/2008 2:52pm PDT
By Roy Posted: 4/30/2008 3:00pm PDT
As to the rest of you, I think it's odd that anyone would discourage Honda (Acura) from building a supercar that will be based on their heritage of winning plenty of Formula One championships (I don't see Lamborghini in that exclusive crowd). This sounds like the old argument of Porsche shouldn't make SUVs, Honda should stick to Lawnmowers and Suzuki should only make sportbikes. With the exception of the latter, I think we've been proven wrong, so let's see what this new Acura brings to the table before we lambast it.
Of course, if I had that kind of cash, I'd want something red, Italian and reeking of hand-stitched leather.
By bambam Posted: 4/30/2008 4:47pm PDT
By Renton Posted: 4/30/2008 5:16pm PDT
They are one of the most successful racing companies ever.
By Gus Posted: 4/30/2008 5:35pm PDT
Porsche shouldn't make SUV's... :)
By Alan Posted: 5/1/2008 9:02am PDT
By Mino Posted: 5/1/2008 10:02am PDT
I drive a Honda, and Support their efforts in racing, but all their "wins" are in MotoGP not car racing. in 2006 I believe they got 4th in the constructor Championship, closest to a "win" in F1.
By NSX Posted: 5/1/2008 1:50pm PDT
By JML Posted: 5/1/2008 5:12pm PDT
By Lexlife Posted: 5/1/2008 9:41pm PDT
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!