By
Nelson Ireson
Nelson Ireson
Editor
BIO
Nelson is an Editor at High Gear Media focusing on reviewing cars and covering the hottest topics in luxury and performance cars, car culture, and...
More
LATEST ARTICLE
2013 Porsche 911 GT3 Spy Shots
Porsche's latest generation of the 911, the 991, has just recently made its way onto the scene...
Read More
- #3LEADERBOARD RANK
- 5432ARTICLES CONTRIBUTED
- 205COMMENTS POSTED
The pinch of significantly higher U.S. fuel economy standards is beginning to get automakers talking about how they plan to meet the challenge, and Hyundai has announced a two-pronged approach. Better engine and drivetrain technology will get the company half way to its goal, and the rest will be handled by lighter materials and more efficient accessories.
Because the new CAFE rules base the fuel economy requirements on the footprint of the vehicle - the area enclosed by the car's wheels - Hyundai has a target of 37.5mpg average by 2015 for its cars and
trucks combined. Making the engine more efficient, decreasing weight and rolling resistance and lightening the load of accessories on the engine will combine to boost efficiency to the required levels, reports
Automotive News.
Direct injection technology should yield between 3% and 6% on its own according to Hyundai. Increasing the availability of six-speed automatics will also help - initially on all V6-engined American models, then after 2010, even four-cylinder models except for the very smallest cars.
Other savings can be gained from aerodynamics, low rolling resistance tires, more electrically efficient LED lights and electric power steering. The common hydraulic power steering costs as much as 1mph against its electric alternative, thanks to the drain on the engine plus the extra weight in the form of belts, pulleys and pumps. Electric power steering achieves the same end result with less weight and rotating mass tied to the engine, improving efficiency.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!
By Raptor Posted: 5/5/2008 2:20pm PDT
By PJE Posted: 5/5/2008 3:30pm PDT
There are a lot of materials - aluminum, magnesium, etc which fit the current production lines more easily than CF, and give a significant weight saving over steel. As Audi and Jaguar found, you can save a lot of weight out of the body in white, but quite a lot of that weight gets put back in with all the extras that come with the luxury cars - heated/cooled seats - etc.
The Audi A2 showed what can be done in a small light vehicle, but was not a success due to being slightly too small at the price point it was aimed at.
By Roy Posted: 5/5/2008 5:51pm PDT
I wonder if these new CAFE rules are going to spawn a bunch of light cars with huge wheelbases, with the wheels at the furthest corners of the vehicle. I suggest this since the article mentions that the severity of the economy requirement is proportional to 'footprint' (wheelbase?).
By Raptor Posted: 5/6/2008 1:12am PDT
By MyWheelsOnWalls.com Posted: 5/6/2008 2:09am PDT
As for magnesium, have you ever seen that stuff burn. There is a reason why race teams no longer use it for their wheels.
So I'd say aluminum will win for the near future until CF can be produced in a cheap way and by mass quantities.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!