Advertisement

Cadillac prices the CTS-V at $59,995, sales start Nov. 1

 
Follow Nelson

2008 cadillac cts v motorauthority 001

The CTS-V offers a remarkable value in the high-performance luxury sedan segment

The CTS-V offers a remarkable value in the high-performance luxury sedan segment

Enlarge Photo
Launching a come-back to sit among the world's best luxury sport sedans is no easy task, especially with the level of competition there is today from companies like Mercedes-Benz, Audi, BMW and Lexus. But Cadillac appears to have done just that with its CTS, and now the CTS-V is poised to take the high-performance luxury sedan crown as well, doing it at a bargain price of just $59,995.

Sales of the all-new 556hp (414kW) supercharged 6.2L V8 CTS-V kick off on November 1 in the U.S., but excited customers have likely already reserved their place in line. Production volume figures for the CTS-V haven't been announced yet, but GM is likely planning a flexible production run depending on demand. It will be interesting to see if the CTS-V generates enough cachet to be a 'recession-proof' car like so many high-end luxury and sports cars, or if its affordable pricing will actually make sales harder in the short run. At any rate, the 'new factor' should drive initial sales well.

At just under $60,000, the CTS-V is priced along the lines of a very well-outfitted BMW 335i, and about $5-10,000 below a typical BMW M3 or Lexus IS F. Mercedes-Benz's E63 AMG, the carmaker's true competition for the CTS-V, starts at $88,575, though the C63 AMG falls closer at $57,175. And since it's about even with the 5-series on size, ahead of it in performance, and priced around $25,000 below, it's hard to imagine a good reason not to choose the CTS-V if you're in the market for such a car.


In June, Cadillac announced the CTS-V's official power figures to the world. The car gets a Society of Automotive Engineer's certification of 556hp (414kW) and 551lb-ft (746Nm) of torque at the crank. The top power figure arrives at 6,100rpm and maximum torque comes at a pleasantly mid-range 3,800rpm.

That much power is enough to move the big sedan to 60mph in just 3.9 seconds and to complete the quarter-mile in an even 12 seconds with a trap speed of 118mph (189km/h). Those numbers are enough to wilt even the impressive BMW M5's figures put down with the aid of its 505hp (376kW) V10. Combined with a full complement of luxury features, paddle-shifted automatic transmission, adjustable magnetic suspension and its record-breaking 7m59s Nurburgring lap time, the American sedan is headed straight to the front of the luxury sport sedan class.

BMW and Mercedes both have updates due to debut at next year's March Geneva Motor Show however. The new 5-series and E-Class are expected to debut along side their high-performance M and AMG variants, so the Cadillac super-sedan should soon have some company, though it appears to be a step ahead at the present.

The newest CTS has won accolades from the automotive press for its looks, its performance and its comfort. The first thing that grabs the eye when you look at the CTS-V is the gaping maw of the mesh grille. Once you break your eyes from its grasp, the bulging hood and angular headlights are the next things to steal some attention. The front splitter and aero package are also new, but other than that, there’s not much to distinguish the CTS-V from the regular CTS - but considering the CTS’s already charming good looks, that’s not a bad thing.

The LSA engine, while not quite as highly tuned as the LS9 powering the Corvette ZR-1 to 638hp (476kW), is still a mammoth for the performance sedan ranks, outstripping even the V10 in the BMW M5. Two six-speed transmissions are available, one manual, the other a paddle-shifted Hydramatic automatic - a first for the CTS-V. The manual is a dual-disc clutch equipped Tremec TR6060.

The CTS-V’s Magnetic Ride Control makes the suspension in the CTS-V so quick reacting that Cadillac claims it’s the world’s fastest. Featuring two modes (Tour and Sport) that can be selected on the fly, the CTS-V can be adjusted to suit the driving style and conditions at hand. Massive Brembo six-piston calipers up front and four piston calipers in the rear ensure the big sedan can come to a stop in a serious hurry. The rotors (of undisclosed diameter) are slotted and vented to resist fade.

A sophisticated traction control system is also fitted to the car, which is a good thing when you have so much power on tap - no one wants to pay complete attention all the time, and the CTS-V can considered as a daily driver. Although considering the Performance Traction Management system in the CTS-V is derived from the CTS-V racecar, you won’t be giving up all that much in terms of performance even with it engaged - it’s actually designed to ensure the greatest possible traction while still delivering great performance, not to slow the car and regain traction like most other traction control systems.





 
 

Have an opinion?

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (27)
  1. It's surprising that the horsepower race is still this heated.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. Let's keep it honest: paddle-shifted automatic... slushbox, yes ancient torque converter based.
    Also no word about the weight... so it must be over 2000 kg...
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. This is a LUXURY sport car .who cares about weight when it does 1/4 in 12s .. wow !! luxury luxury luxury , i like it
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. daily driver --------- 10 - 12 mpg
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. That's why I'm surprised.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. Looks like a good car in deed, but you can´t compare this with hi-class Bmw or Mercedes, ít´s just a completely different category. When Daewoo or Kia make a sport sedan, then this car will have some same-level rivals.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  7. If you think this looks great, wait 'til you see the accessory tank trailer for extended trips.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  8. think its like 24mpg highway
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  9. Muro, you hit the nail on the head. I couldn't have said it better myself.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  10. This is where I get lost. “But you can´t compare this with hi-class Bmw or Mercedes, it’s just a completely different category.” Why? If memory serves me correct, Cadillac usually undercuts the competition [the Germans] in price. Is it the lack of features? Reliability issues? Not practicle? Suggestive looks? Considering that the car hasn’t even been released yet all I can compare it to is the regular CTS which when in the driver’s seat is a very nice place to be. I’m not in any way a loyalist to any car maker because of their name or heritage, but I can’t help but feel the need to give props to makers of good automobiles. I dislike reading how such snap decisions can be made about an automobile simply because it’s American or some silly prejudice. The ingenuity that the Americans, Koreans, or Chinese bring to the table might amaze you, but before you make a hasty decision, put the car up on a lift and see for yourself.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  11. yall funny , if u think the gas milage or whatever isnt for u then dont buy it , but if thas what u want make urself happy
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  12. kgt i worked @ bmw in greenville sc , and the quality aint what u think it is , so when u pay for bmw u are paying for the name , u think about it look at what the mostppopular car on the road is now , honda accord old and new , and on the %'s see more hondas or toyotas on the road then bmw, mercedes etc...
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  13. How about we drop the perceptions and judge a brand on the facts. http://www.jdpower.com/autos/ratings/quality-ratings-by-brand/sortcolumn-0/ascending/page-2#page-anchor

    You'll notice some interesting things.

    1. On overall quality and design Cadillac trumps BMW and Merc. (double the rating of BMW infact)
    2. They tied Lexus

    Finally the only two brands to get a perfect score in this category were Porsche and (drum roll) JAGUAR!!!!!

    So Mercedes really is no longer the perfectionist king and BMW really is a Bunch of Money Wasted.........
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  14. P.S. I was just looking at some of the other categorys. If you own a Buick and also buy/judge cars on perception you can now tell people that your Buick's power trains quality and design got the same score by JD Power (a very respected brand) as BMW..... hmmm


    Once again a link to the FACTS!

    http://www.jdpower.com/autos/ratings/quality-ratings-by-brand/sortcolumn-0/ascending/page-2#page-anchor
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  15. Wow, I wonder if any of you sat in new CTS or old for that matter. This car has it all. I'd def get this over C63 or M3 sedan. It's way cheaper and has better performance figures.

    I don't like the new grill though, stock grill on regular 08 CTS makes the car, with V grill it's hard to tell if it's old gen or new gen CTS.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  16. This car's performance is an incredible accomplishment for GM. The styling is a bit over the top for me, although I love the look of the non-V CTS.

    I'll bet no dealer lets one go for less than $80k until 2010. They must be salivating so hard at this markup opportunity that the drool is surely puddling on the showroom floors...

    If the CTS-V, Cobalt SS and ZR1 are any indication, GM is finally taking vehicle performance seriously. That means I'm gonna have a really hard time deciding between an S3000 and a C7 'Vette in 2012...
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  17. I would like to see a CTS wagon in V form
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  18. I have to laugh at you guys that think Mercedes and BMW are so far ahead of this in terms of quality and refinement. My first AMG (C32) didn't exactly break any reliability records. Nor was the fit and finish superb. Same goes with the BMW I had. I'm on my second AMG and so far so good but don't think the Germans are untouchable or are that the cars are designed by magical fairies that sprinkle magic dust over them before they leave the factory. This is coming from an AMG owner!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  19. This car is awesome, and the price! Man, I would love to have one.

    And as far as this whole BMW and Benz thing, those brands aren't about better quality. BRAND NAME and BADGE RECOGNITION. That's why you would choose one of those over the CTS. To me, the cache that comes with an AMG or an M Division car is well worth the extra money. If money is an issue, then that CTS wins, otherwise it's the Germans all the way.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  20. Buying something for brand recoginition when there is a better choice is stupid and snobby
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  21. That's just your opinion. People with money would think it's dumb for themselves to drive a car that anyone could afford instead of getting something that only a select few can afford. Rich people wouldn't buy small houses, they would buy mansions, so why would it be any different for their cars.

    Frankly, people that say showing off money is snobby are usually just jealous. Money has one purpose, to be spent, and people with more money have more to spend so obviously they'll spend it.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  22. Much more performance, but it lost the appealing sporty appearance its predecessor used to have. Back in 2004, when I saw a CTS-V for the first time in a dealer, it looked like a promissing sports sedan. To me the new CTS-V is just another "sedan sedan". I don't expect a sales record for the new Caddy...
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  23. Not everyone who thinks showing off their money is snobby is jealous, that is opinion, not fact.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  24. 'Frankly, people that say showing off money is snobby are USUALLY just jealous"
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  25. this looks extremely promising, it's truly unfortunate that people dismiss this car simply because it's made by GM. i'm rooting so hard for GM these days despite their old mistakes especially against merc and bmw. i've owned 10 years worth of bmws and, to be perfectly honest, the quality isn't what it used to be. also, ivan (above) mentioned that he'd buy this over the C63 or M3 - most people don't realize that the cts v doesn't compete with either of those - it competes with the M5 and E63 which makes it a HUGE bargain
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  26. I dont know what james is talkin about, this car has been stated by GM as competing with the c63 and m3, this does not compete with the m5 and e63.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  27. bradley, the CTS is the size of the 5 series and E-class, it is only priced to compete with the 3 series.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Follow Us

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Research New Cars

Go!

Related Used Listings

Browse used listings in your area.


 
© 2013 MotorAuthority. All Rights Reserved. MotorAuthority is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.