By
Nelson Ireson
Nelson Ireson
Editor
BIO
Nelson is an Editor at High Gear Media focusing on reviewing cars and covering the hottest topics in luxury and performance cars, car culture, and...
More
LATEST ARTICLE
2014 BMW X5 Spy Shots
A prototype for the upcoming third-generation BMW X5 has been captured in testing once again, this...
Read More
- #3LEADERBOARD RANK
- 5429ARTICLES CONTRIBUTED
- 205COMMENTS POSTED

Mercedes-Benz and Smart electric vehicles coming in 2010
Enlarge Photo
The age of electric vehicles is nearly upon us, with everyone from
Nissan to Peugeot to General Motors at various stages of development. Daimler has now announced that it too will join the ranks of electric vehicle builders by 2010, with both a Smart-branded city car and a Mercedes-branded
luxury vehicle on offer.
Testing for the cars is set to begin soon, with the
electric Smart ForTWo scheduled for a 2009 test-run in the U.S. Mercedes' new S400
hybrid is due out next year as well, and could be a stepping-stone to the EV in 2010. Mercedes has also been testing a handful of
fuel-cell vehicles, including a B-Class prototype, ahead of a planned 2010 launch. Fuel-cell vehicles are technically electric vehicles that store their power in hydrogen or other fuel form instead of batteries, so that may be the direction Mercedes is heading with its first EV. The prototype could also be nothing more than a testing platform for the engine and control systems while a battery pack is in development.
The version of the electric
Smart set to begin testing next year is expected to feature a second-generation electric drive system with lighter and more efficient lithium-ion batteries. Consuming just 12kw-hours per 100km, the average cost of running the car is around two and a half cents per mile and it takes just 5.7 seconds to accelerate from rest to a reasonable driving pace of 60km/h.
One of the primary concerns Daimler has with its EV sales program is how it will handle the battery packs, reports
Automotive News Europe. Like GM with its Volt plug-in hybrid, Daimler is considering a lease scheme for its batteries, since the technology will be both expensive and a wear item. To keep the cars cost-competitive with combustion-powered models at introduction, a lease scheme may be necessary.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!
By Gus Posted: 6/20/2008 12:31pm PDT
By chris Posted: 6/21/2008 1:31am PDT
I'm just glad to see that merc and bwm too are getting into this. merc especially. I wanna see them do this S400... and they'd be really smart to make it simple like GM's technique.. make a single platform that can be a gas electric hybrid... all electric... hydrogen fuel cell... OR cold fusion reactor. Basically.. they need to do the S400 in hyrbid form and then the next year just rip the engine out and put more batteries into it.. in place of the engine. BRILLIANT!
By Gus Posted: 6/21/2008 11:07am PDT
For me, I need something more convenient. I take long road trips, and I want something just as fast as refueling a gasoline vehicle.
What's wrong with my battery exchange argument? I could just see these refilling stations built with an underrground charging room, with a bunch of battery packs lined up in a cooled room, and a robot who zips around, and takes empty one out of the bottoms of cars and SUV's and puts fresh ones in. Pick a standard size, something that would work for the small cars, and then ramp up from there as needed. Something like a Aygo needs one. A Focus two, a Mustang 3 or 4, an S class 5 and an Expedition 6. Like giant AA batteries...
This would solve several problems:
1. Even though you only need to have a cheeseburger, that would be impossible, since the number of cars piled up at a recharging station would be enormous.
2. Not everyone, in fact most people, I would guess, don't have the ability to charge overnight.
3. It would eliminate the argument that electric is less convenient in any way than gasilone.
I'd say number 3 is the key, though, don't you?
By Gus Posted: 6/21/2008 11:15am PDT
Anyway, I want to be able to drive on a road trip, decide to take a side road somewhere, knowing that there'll be a battery station (how cool does that sound, compared to GAS station) somewhere down the road in case I run my electric Mustang GT convertible (which has enough torque to pull a train, I'm getting all excitied now) a little harder than I thought I would.
Now, if I do run out of juice, a AAA truck would come by and charge me up for a few minutes, which my onboard GPS computer calculates can get me to the next battery station...
No, it has to be seamless so nobody can say it's not convenient enough or too restrictive...
By chris Posted: 6/23/2008 8:23am PDT
I think you'll have a hell of a time convincing the 15 or so major car companies out there to agree on a standard battery (voltage, dimensions, cooling load, etc)... I mean, sony and panasonic couldn't agree on the programming of a couple header files on what remains a VERY similar technology, so for several years, the market was split over HD and Bluray. thats it. the "format" war wasn't an issue of compatibility in the physical world, just an issue with programming.
It would be like standardizing Shell's V-Power brand gasoline. I mean, any gasoline will run in any car, where as electricity is a little less forgiving, but it's essentially the same thing. Personally I think it's already too late cause you've got several competing car brands already signed up with competing electronics firms. See... the IEEE or the SAE should have stepped in several years ago and proposed a standard for future use. Not uncommon at all. Some one dropped the ball some where.
There's a logistics problem with the swapping idea, which ends up being cost, and battery appraisal. Something tells me a battery station like what you describe would be a little more costly than a gas station. But the big problem would be the fact that you could essentially drive up to a battery station and swap out your 5 year old battery that is nearly shot for (probably) a newer battery. The batteries would have to have a tamper proof computer that logged kWh (energy), mileage, age, and maybe some sort of factor that measures how hard the batteries are pushed (so that some sucker with an aygo doesnt get stuck with one of those 3 or 4 batteries you just cooked in your 1000ftlb mustang).
Basically what you're saying is that gas stations today should be set up to replace your entire drive train (including gas tank) instead of just refilling. the battery tech right now can be recharged in 15 minutes. by the time this stuff really becomes main stream... I suspect 15 minutes would be laughable. Besides, you've gotta park to get your burger right? You're thinking of a recharge station like a gas station. It's more like a parking lot. clearly not all stalls need a charging station, and yes, some times you'll show up and have to wait. but thats the same thing today at a gas station.
By admin Posted: 6/23/2008 8:34am PDT
By Gus Posted: 6/23/2008 2:25pm PDT
I really don't think people will be willing to wait 15 minutes, but I could be wrong. I get upset when I use a "slow" pump these days that takes me more than 5 minutes. I get all excited at "fast" pumps where you can just feel the power!
I'll stand by my theory, of course your points are valid, Chris, but for me, that is wht I would want. Quick, flexible, widely available. In short, I want to give up nothing in the way of convenience and time, and I want my car quiet, long lasting and fast.
Thank you, that is all, I have spoken and thus it is so. :)
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!