
Update: McCain refuses to support bailout scheme for Detroit 3
Update: Senator and Republican presidential candidate John McCain has reiterated his tough stance against supporting a bailout for the Detroit 3 by refusing to lend his backing to proposals that entail federal government guarantees for loans taken out by America’s carmakers.
While the proposals have been varied and abounding from different camps, McCain is consistent with his thoughts on bailing out domestic auto manufacturers. His stance thus far is that it’s not the role of the government to be a crutch to these businesses, a view also shared by current president George W. Bush.
McCain's Democratic rival, Barack Obama, has previously vocalized his
support for loan programs for domestic manufacturers, including "loans and tax credits to retool the nation's auto plants and build the next generation of American cars". Obama has also
previously spoken about his desire to see the American auto industry at the forefront of technology for next-generation cars, rather than lagging behind as it is now, reports
The Detroit News.
General Motors spokesman Greg Martin was apprehensive of McCain's cavalier attitude towards maintaining the auto industry. While McCain had previously stated that guaranteeing loans was like prematurely "predicting failure" in regards to the Detroit 3's efforts, Martin countered that the loans were necessary as domestic manufacturers were doing "nothing short of really reinventing the automobile".
Original: The troubles facing the United States' automobile industry at home and abroad are no secret, with layoffs and plant closures announced almost weekly in recent months.
Senator and Republican presidential candidate John McCain said today that he would not support any government aid for the weakened industry if elected, instead speaking in favor of free trade.
McCain's statement came during a town-hall meeting held at a General Motors plant in Warren, Ohio. That state has felt a significant portion of the impact of the auto industry's recent downsizing, losing nearly manufacturing 250,000 jobs since 2000, reports
Automotive News.
Putting government funds into research and development of next-generation technologies could be possible under a McCain administration, but outright subsidization of the industry was ruled out.
How McCain expects free trade to improve the situation in the industry is unclear. He said he supports free trade, but noted that not all trade agreements are fair, and advocated methods to make dealing with violations of such agreements quicker and easier. "I would do everything in my power to make sure that trade practices are fair and equitable," McCain said.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!
By bambam Posted: 6/28/2008 4:15am PDT
However sometime its takes the government to lead and unite the whole industry to move forward and like always the government will use and aid the best.
By Dane Posted: 6/28/2008 7:35am PDT
Thanks for letting us know now.... lets let billions go to Asia and Europe....
The only company that doesn't have a plan is Chrysler.... Dodge Challenger???? Wow is that a futuristic and classic car..... GM and Ford at least have something in the pip-line... Ford especially.... We helped out Chyrsler back in the late seventies... It worked then why not help the others if needed and they have a plan.....
What does McCain have planned then???? What industry will we have???? Too many Bushes, Reagan's McCains and Chenny's have ruined our industry in the name of high profit for the CEO and White collar workers....
Vote wisely people.......
By Gus Posted: 6/28/2008 10:49am PDT
Regardless of how you feel about his stance toward the auto industry, Obama's lack of experience is such a threat that the car industry will be the least of your worries...
By Guy Posted: 6/29/2008 9:37am PDT
By chris Posted: 6/30/2008 7:32am PDT
lets put it this way, do you think the government gave out those stimulus checks out of the good of their heart? the BUSH administration? no... the government feeds off of a strong economy. and that was money they just dropped on a load of people... without stipulating how they had to spend it.
there aren't enough rich people left in the USA to keep the republicans in office. you've got a country that is sick of war, sick of bush, and all they see in McCain is more bush. then you've got barack who doesn't look like he'll die within his first term, and is actually talking about new things instead of business as usual.
I think it's going to be within 5%, but I'd be willing to put my money on barack at this point. we'll see in november.
By Guy Posted: 6/30/2008 9:46am PDT
By chris Posted: 8/1/2008 9:04pm PDT
i keep coming back tot he delinquent son analogy. do you beat the delinquent son when the cops bring him home at night? do you kick him out of your house? or do you reward good behaviour?
I used to be a bastard of a teen.. then my parents offered me good money for good grades. i'm an electrical engineer now. you want to call it bribery, fine. would you go to work if you wern't getting paid? no. would you take on more responsibility for the same pay? no. encourage these companies to do better. like i said before, the german government and the japanese government are in bed with their local companies.. but the USA is a bunch of winners.. not a bunch of losers.. so lets cut them loose if they cant compete? backwards logic. and it only serves to hurt the economy as well. ill come back to it... 2 trillion dollars wasted in iraq and afghanistan on people who for the most part don't WANT your damned help. but incentive programs (in the few billion dollar range) for your domestic automakers to be rewarded for making fuel efficient, high quality, segment leading vehicles?? F*** that.
way to go america. the top 1% stand on the bones on the lower 99%. as always. do they teach "Red October" in american schools? shame.
By Anthony Posted: 8/14/2008 9:05am PDT
By Nick S. Posted: 8/14/2008 9:42am PDT
American car companies fell behind in the technology of automobiles as gas prices soared and they do need our help because of that incompetence. While I don't exactly think throwing money at them is a good idea, it's better than just ignoring the absolutely horrible position all three companies are in right now.
By Paul Posted: 8/14/2008 12:13pm PDT
Look, the automakers don't need a bailout yet anyway. Let'em make adjustments. Let'em try. Let'em get desperate. It's good for 'em. Look at how much they have changed since just 2 years ago. They haven't had a change in direction this dramatic ever. Even the transition out of the 70's barges that got 9 mpg wasn't as dramatic as we are going to see in the next 2 years.
BTW, something like 80% of cars sold in the first 1/2 of this year in the US were 4 cylinders.
Who would of guessed?
Some of the horrific losses seen lately are misleading because of write offs and accounting changes. I think a lot of companies are doing this now because its almost expected for co.'s now to have huge losses. Now they are adjusting their budgets with fewer employees and combined research etc. They will look better soon.
If the new gen cars coming out bomb, then we will need bailouts. All of us.
By tyler Posted: 9/3/2008 9:09pm PDT
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!