By
Nelson Ireson
Nelson Ireson
Editor
BIO
Nelson is an Editor at High Gear Media focusing on reviewing cars and covering the hottest topics in luxury and performance cars, car culture, and...
More
LATEST ARTICLE
2012 BMW M6 Preview
With the new 6-Series Gran Coupe, the revised 6-Series Coupe and Convertible, and now the 2012 M6...
Read More
- #3LEADERBOARD RANK
- 5124ARTICLES CONTRIBUTED
- 187COMMENTS POSTED
The new
king of General Motors' lineup, the Corvette ZR-1, has barely begun making the official press rounds but already insiders are talking about the next-generation version of the car, expected to be based on the as-yet unrevealed C7 Corvette. Definite information is at a premium, but speculation indicates the next ZR-1 could feature a twin-turbo V6 powerplant in place of the traditional big V8.
Wild ideas, including mid-engine designs, have been circulating around the C7 generation of the Corvette, but so far most have proven to be little more than fanciful wish-lists. The latest reports, however, seem to be grounded more firmly in reality, if still completely unofficial. The Corvette will almost certainly remain front-engined and reasonably affordable, reports
Popular Mechanics. The drastic change in design would lie under the hood, where the
6.2L LS9 that currently generates a furious, supercharged 638hp (476kW) and 604lb-ft (819Nm) of torque would be supplanted by a twin-turbo V6, such as a modified version of the 3.6L direct-injection unit current found in the
Cadillac CTS.
Insiders reportedly think that engine, in twin-turbo form, could easily produce 400hp (298kW), and given its current naturally-aspirated rating of 306hp (228kW), that sounds like a reasonable claim. That figure sits close to today's entry-level Corvette V8, but is a far cry from the ground-pounding ZR-1's statistical dominance. Extracting enough performance from such a small unit to generate the three levels of Corvette we've grown so familiar with - the base, Z06 and ZR-1 - could end up creating a very highly-strung unit at the upper end of the range. So highly strung that the cost and technology necessary might make it cost-prohibitive, even when fuel efficiency savings are taken into effect.
Though that in itself is a bit of a quandary for the twin-turbo idea, as the torquey V8s in the current cars are geared low enough that city and highway fuel economy isn't poor for the sports car class - even the brutal ZR-1 rates at 14mpg city and 20mpg highway. That's a long way from the CAFE-required 35mpg fleet average, but the ZR-1 isn't a high-volume unit. The current standard 'Vette manages a more respectable 16mpg city and 26mpg highway in manual guise. Beating those figures with a twin-turbo V6 won't be easy, as the slightly heavier but similarly powerful
Nissan GT-R proves with its 16mpg city/21mpg highway rating.
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!
By NoNameDenton Posted: 8/20/2008 4:28pm PDT
By chris Posted: 8/20/2008 5:10pm PDT
By www.mywheelsonwalls.com Posted: 8/20/2008 6:41pm PDT
Stick with the basic shape or a progression of ,yes and push forward with a technological advance in power supply/generation...... So a twin turbo V6 maybe a good idea and also a stepping stone to the fact that engines will be changing and that heritage cant rely on cylinders.
I often associated Ferrari F1 cars as only having V12's and anything else would be pure sac-religous [sic] but infact they are doing just fine as a brand without and if anything I now associate Ferrari in F1 as a technology leader.
By Gus Posted: 8/20/2008 6:47pm PDT
Low-end torque.
When I drove one of the new Vette's, I could not believe how much thrust came out of that car before I even heard the engine. It's like an electric car from idle-2500 RPMs it's so smooth and powerful.
Maybe a force-fed V6 could do the same thing, but I doubt it would be so smooth, effortless, and, how do I put this, "thrusty"?
By john woo Posted: 8/20/2008 6:51pm PDT
By NoNameDenton Posted: 8/20/2008 8:14pm PDT
By lamboguy Posted: 8/20/2008 10:00pm PDT
By Turkle Posted: 8/20/2008 10:34pm PDT
Oh, and NoNameDenton beat me to the punch. Come out with a smaller displacement T/T V8 for the ZR-1. If Chevy has to use a T/T V6, let it be the base model, not the ZR-1.
By raptor Posted: 8/21/2008 2:28am PDT
You can't make an iconic car without its most important feature - specific sound of good old V-8.
By nice... Posted: 11/2/2009 8:23am PST
By Gman Posted: 11/11/2009 8:35am PST
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!