C7 Corvette ZR-1 to be twin-turbo V6?

 
Follow Nelson

C7 Corvette ZR-1 to be twin-turbo V6?

C7 Corvette ZR-1 to be twin-turbo V6?

Enlarge Photo
The new king of General Motors' lineup, the Corvette ZR-1, has barely begun making the official press rounds but already insiders are talking about the next-generation version of the car, expected to be based on the as-yet unrevealed C7 Corvette. Definite information is at a premium, but speculation indicates the next ZR-1 could feature a twin-turbo V6 powerplant in place of the traditional big V8.

Wild ideas, including mid-engine designs, have been circulating around the C7 generation of the Corvette, but so far most have proven to be little more than fanciful wish-lists. The latest reports, however, seem to be grounded more firmly in reality, if still completely unofficial. The Corvette will almost certainly remain front-engined and reasonably affordable, reports Popular Mechanics. The drastic change in design would lie under the hood, where the 6.2L LS9 that currently generates a furious, supercharged 638hp (476kW) and 604lb-ft (819Nm) of torque would be supplanted by a twin-turbo V6, such as a modified version of the 3.6L direct-injection unit current found in the Cadillac CTS.

Insiders reportedly think that engine, in twin-turbo form, could easily produce 400hp (298kW), and given its current naturally-aspirated rating of 306hp (228kW), that sounds like a reasonable claim. That figure sits close to today's entry-level Corvette V8, but is a far cry from the ground-pounding ZR-1's statistical dominance. Extracting enough performance from such a small unit to generate the three levels of Corvette we've grown so familiar with - the base, Z06 and ZR-1 - could end up creating a very highly-strung unit at the upper end of the range. So highly strung that the cost and technology necessary might make it cost-prohibitive, even when fuel efficiency savings are taken into effect.

Though that in itself is a bit of a quandary for the twin-turbo idea, as the torquey V8s in the current cars are geared low enough that city and highway fuel economy isn't poor for the sports car class - even the brutal ZR-1 rates at 14mpg city and 20mpg highway. That's a long way from the CAFE-required 35mpg fleet average, but the ZR-1 isn't a high-volume unit. The current standard 'Vette manages a more respectable 16mpg city and 26mpg highway in manual guise. Beating those figures with a twin-turbo V6 won't be easy, as the slightly heavier but similarly powerful Nissan GT-R proves with its 16mpg city/21mpg highway rating.



 
Follow Us

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

  • Posting indicates you have read this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use
  • Notify me when there are more comments
Comments (12)
  1. Heresy, the V8's in the Vette already get pretty great fuel economy, add direct injection and a few other fuel saving but power boosting features to bring the milage up more, do not drop cylinders.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  2. yeah i concur.. if you drop a turbo 6 in the base vette then you have nothing more than a glorified camaro.. if anything, keep the vette name pure and put your "mid range" power into the camaro... make that a turbo 6 or a turbo 4 for all i care.. the vette stays V8
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  3. V6 or V8 I fail to see the problem as GM needs to look at the whole picture and protect the Corvette as a brand. I say this as in our life time such cars will not have cylinders nor will they be powered by fossil fuels.

    Stick with the basic shape or a progression of ,yes and push forward with a technological advance in power supply/generation...... So a twin turbo V6 maybe a good idea and also a stepping stone to the fact that engines will be changing and that heritage cant rely on cylinders.

    I often associated Ferrari F1 cars as only having V12's and anything else would be pure sac-religous [sic] but infact they are doing just fine as a brand without and if anything I now associate Ferrari in F1 as a technology leader.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  4. Something we're not talking about here that is very important for this car and others like it:
    Low-end torque.
    When I drove one of the new Vette's, I could not believe how much thrust came out of that car before I even heard the engine. It's like an electric car from idle-2500 RPMs it's so smooth and powerful.
    Maybe a force-fed V6 could do the same thing, but I doubt it would be so smooth, effortless, and, how do I put this, "thrusty"?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  5. perhaps they're trying to beat the GTR at its own's game by going twinturbo v6?
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  6. I would accept a Corvette with a twin turbo V8 if the downzied how big the V8 is, but not a V6. The only Corvettes to not have a V8 was back when the car was first in production back in the 1950's.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  7. Why only a V6,American cars are supposed to be big V8s. Sorry i say NO!
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  8. John Woo, you have a point. The only reason this speculation has any traction is due to the performance numbers generated by the GTR. I am sure that Chevy feels that they could make a T/T V6 Corvette that is more powerful than the GTR and lighter.

    Oh, and NoNameDenton beat me to the punch. Come out with a smaller displacement T/T V8 for the ZR-1. If Chevy has to use a T/T V6, let it be the base model, not the ZR-1.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  9. Why don't they make 3 L V-8 and throw two turbos on it?

    You can't make an iconic car without its most important feature - specific sound of good old V-8.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  10. Here we go.. Remember what happen to the thunder bird... Soon we'll have a four seater vette...
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  11. It's sad the Corvette doesn't currently incorporate an updated and increased displacement E-85 version of the "XV8" (2001 era experimental design at least as an extra-cost option). It was designed to include DI, AFM, and could also idle on four cylinders as well. If combined with the improved BAS-plus hybrid system (Li-ion battery equipped), fuel mileage would today be quite incredible for a 400+ hp vehicle. Once warmed up, and stopped at a traffic signal, the Corvette could accelerate at modest to moderate levels using just four cylinders and the BAS-plus electric motor. At highway speeds under light load conditions, it could again cruise and operate on just four cylinders. This is a no-brainer -- and some of us would "gladly pay" for these options -- irregardless of their "payback period," if ever. In the future, a "two-mode hybrid system" could be included, or made optional, with either an advanced twin-turbo V6 gas, or modern 4.5 liter V8 diesel engine. Volt/Ampera technology could also be incorporated as well. Maybe getting an electric drive motor for each wheel.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

  12. I really hope they don't, I mean they can get the same power with a twin turbo v6, but what about that awesome sounds from the V8? It's not gonna look good on a Vette.
     
    Post Reply
    Vote
    Bad stuff?

 

Have an opinion?Join the conversation!

Connect with Facebook

Motor Authority. Now with your friends.

Discover stories your friends read.
Share stories more easily.
You control what you share.
Learn more

Research New Cars

Go!


 
© 2011 MotorAuthority. All Rights Reserved. MotorAuthority is published by High Gear Media. Stock photography by Homestar, LLC. Send us feedback.