The Phoneix V6 makes its efficiency gains by using cylinder-deactivation technology to shut down three cylinders, allowing it to function on half of its maximum displacement when under low loads. This feature is reported to be good for a 6-8% improvement in most cases. Taken together with the improved around-town handling likely to come from unibody construction, the Cherokee could see a significant boost in sales among mainstream buyers.
In preparation for the new model, Chrysler plans to spend more than $1.8 billion to refit its Jefferson assembly plant in North Detroit. The same plant will also be responsible for several yet-to-be revealed models based on the same platform, LaSorda explained to Automotive News reporters. The new platform was jointly developed with Mercedes-Benz, but there won’t be much else in common between the future Chrysler and Mercedes products.
To help raise funds for the expansion and retooling of the plant, Chrysler will sell up to $1 billion in non-earning assets. Some of these assets include land around its headquarters in Auburn Hills, Michigan, and its Tritec engine plant in Brazil.
LaSorda also confirmed that a future small car currently being developed with China’s Chery Auto is still on track despite a number of engineering changes being made. If the updates are completed in time, the car could go on sale in North America by as early as next year.
Have an opinion?
NoNameDenton Posted: 8/13/2008 7:33pm PDT
Michael D. Posted: 8/13/2008 9:50pm PDT
I'm also wondering, and hoping, will the Hemi still be offered in this? The Hemi is powerful & efficent for it has cylinder-deactivation. There's also the Hemi-Hybrid introduced in the Durango and Aspen, that could be a good candidate for the next Grand Cherokee. Also, being the Hemi is in LX's, I would figure it to be applied to a car-based, unibody Grand-Cherokee, and it, the Hemi, would also be more suitable for towing purposes.
Guber Posted: 8/13/2008 10:41pm PDT
Laz Posted: 8/14/2008 9:27am PDT
craigs Posted: 9/15/2008 11:39am PDT
NoNameDenton Posted: 9/15/2008 1:33pm PDT
Gus Posted: 9/15/2008 2:29pm PDT
So, while I applaud efforts to make them more fuel efficient, I think the main crux is that most people really don't need them in the first place...
NoNameDenton Posted: 9/15/2008 3:48pm PDT
DougeTX Posted: 9/15/2008 6:21pm PDT
NoNameDenton Posted: 9/15/2008 7:24pm PDT
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!