Matt brings to the table a very intimate knowledge of modern Mustangs, Camaros and Challengers not only from the books in his collection but from... More
This time it's the other co-host of Top Gear, Richard Hammond who makes himself look like an idiot. In the video he races a remote controlled car against a Shelby GT not a Shelby GT500 as he states. You can clearly tell it's the Shelby GT and not a Shelby GT500, any 5-year old could tell you that. Makes you wonder if they are doing this on purpose or are they really that stupid. Thanks for the tip 'Chris'.
Maybe you should watch some more episodes of Top Gear. They aren't serious half the time. But anyways, here's a clip where the presenter up above (Hammond) drives his own GT 390:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MneTKjKHG0Q
Post Reply
Vote
Bad stuff?
By Chuck
Posted: 3/11/2008 7:24am PDT
C'mon, they're British...
I mean, we have have muscle cars - they have yellow teeth! :-D
BTW - Despite this things, I quite like the show!
Post Reply
Vote
Bad stuff?
By steve
Posted: 3/11/2008 10:26am PDT
THE ONLY SENSIBLE PERSON ON TOP GEAR
IS THE STIG!!
Post Reply
Vote
Bad stuff?
By Justin
Posted: 3/11/2008 3:38pm PDT
Did you notice the tailights on the Shelby GT? They've got the white lights down the middle, just like the spy shots of the 2010 model, but the front end doesn't look like it's changed at all from the 2005 - 2008 model.
Post Reply
Vote
Bad stuff?
By Kyle
Posted: 3/12/2008 1:36am PDT
Again, you've found something that is definitely wrong but you're way behind. This episode aired months ago.
If you really want to get mad at the Brits, look for the GT500 road test where they completely lie to their viewers about dyno numbers. They roll the GT500 onto a dyno and get 435 at the rear wheels, then say what a ripoff the car is. No explanation of flywheel vs rear wheel power, just makes it look like a bunch of Americans lied and can't build a car right.
I think the Jeremy Clarkson and his cohorts should be looking at some more serious issues like air pollution, carbon emissions, running costs, fuel efficiency etc. I think it is electric vehicles(such as those manufactured by ZAP)that are the vehicles of the future and what Jeremy and his merry men should be looking to promote!
Post Reply
Vote
Bad stuff?
By dacon
Posted: 3/17/2008 1:26pm PDT
"I think the Jeremy Clarkson and his cohorts should be looking at some more serious issues"
Go watch "Fifth Gear" a more informative, fact based auto program.
This is about entertainment, the only reason the BBC even gave them a second chance at airing top gear was because people found it entertaining. Regular people dont want to see die hard hardcore reviews of cars etc... It's been proving. Which is why they were cancelled.
But as an entertainment program, it just shines. Plus, they do honest reviews of some of the best cars out there (and in fact have even payed attention to the emissions of vehicles ala F430 / 997 Turbo).
Post Reply
Vote
Bad stuff?
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!
Connect with Facebook
Motor Authority. Now with your friends.
Discover stories your friends read. Share stories more easily. You control what you share. Learn more
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!
By Ross Posted: 3/11/2008 3:24am PDT
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MneTKjKHG0Q
By Chuck Posted: 3/11/2008 7:24am PDT
I mean, we have have muscle cars - they have yellow teeth! :-D
BTW - Despite this things, I quite like the show!
By steve Posted: 3/11/2008 10:26am PDT
IS THE STIG!!
By Justin Posted: 3/11/2008 3:38pm PDT
By Kyle Posted: 3/12/2008 1:36am PDT
If you really want to get mad at the Brits, look for the GT500 road test where they completely lie to their viewers about dyno numbers. They roll the GT500 onto a dyno and get 435 at the rear wheels, then say what a ripoff the car is. No explanation of flywheel vs rear wheel power, just makes it look like a bunch of Americans lied and can't build a car right.
By NiraliSherni Posted: 3/14/2008 6:12am PDT
By dacon Posted: 3/17/2008 1:26pm PDT
Go watch "Fifth Gear" a more informative, fact based auto program.
This is about entertainment, the only reason the BBC even gave them a second chance at airing top gear was because people found it entertaining. Regular people dont want to see die hard hardcore reviews of cars etc... It's been proving. Which is why they were cancelled.
But as an entertainment program, it just shines. Plus, they do honest reviews of some of the best cars out there (and in fact have even payed attention to the emissions of vehicles ala F430 / 997 Turbo).
Have an opinion?Join the conversation!