
Wiedeking is critical of using taxpayer funding to support inefficient private companies
Enlarge PhotoPorsche experienced a year of record profit last year, earning a profit of €4.24 after tax. Sales also reached record levels, earning the company revenues of €7.4 billion. These figures are expected to be improved upon this year, according to Porsche CEO Wendelin Wiedeking.
In a speech in the city of Frankfurt, Wiedeking affirmed that Porsche is better than it has ever been and that shareholders will be "rejoicing" at the coming financial results, reports Auto Motor und Sport. He also criticized the way the current global financial crisis is being handled, especially by the auto industry.
Citing the lack of responsibility shown by many companies, Wiedeking slammed auto companies for having previously operated for their own private profit but then wanting to socialize their losses. Wiedeking was also vocal about the use of taxpayer money in bailing out inefficient private companies, referring to both the U.S. bailout and the recent request from European carmakers for a similar aid package.
The future is looking very bright for Porsche. The company plans to expand its stake in VW group from the current 35% to a controlling 50% by the end of next month, and its upcoming Panamera sedan is expected to be one of the most profitable models in its portfolio.
More from MotorAuthority
-
11/06/2009
Opel Boss Carl-Peter Forster Calls It Quits
Carl-Peter Forster, GM group vice president and president of Opel, will be ...
-
11/06/2009
GM Czar Lutz Heading Back To Europe--To Opel?
GM's sudden decision this week to reverse path and keep Opel rather than ...
-
11/06/2009
Toyota To Put 2010 4Runner Through The Baja 1000 Wringer
Toyota's involvement in motorsports has been a hot topic this week with ...
More from High Gear Media
-
TheCarConnection.com | 11/07/2009
Driven: 2010 BMW ActiveHybrid X6
BMW's X6 "Sports Activity Coupe" is a car of contradictions. Our review ...
-
TheCarConnection.com | 11/06/2009
Opel CEO Calls It Quits, Rolls-Royce Hybrid: Today’s Car News
It’s official. The boss of Opel, Carl-Peter Forster, will be leaving ...
-
TheCarConnection.com | 11/06/2009
2010 Ford Focus
2010 FORD FOCUS STYLING | [6 out of 10] Kelley Blue Book: "Improved ...


Comments (5 total)
Meet the top commenters on the LeaderboardThis is where Porsche rubs me the wrong way! First off, something is only profitable if it sells! Second, as recently as the early nineties Porsche's idea of quality was to just get the cars built. Then we'll pay a bunch of money to guy's in white coats to run around and fix what was missed on the production line. This mentality drove them to near failure and the Japanese wiped their ass with Supra's, 300 Z's and RX7's.
Did they rescue themselve's? Nope, they hired consultants from Toyota to teach them how to make cars with that now tried and true process of JIT manufacturing.
Typical Germans running around pointing fingers with no credit given!!!
Yes the U.S. auto industry has made a mojor mistake that could cost it and the country big time. Yet I pose one question. Which U.S. manufacturer has been winning its class at LeMans lately? ____________ Not a bad achievement considering the production version is a bit of plastic running around on leaf springs!!!
I agree 100%. I think its stupid for the government to bailout every company which screwed up. It would be one thing if it would be some sort of instant crisis where the companies would have no time to prepare, but this, the shit they're in now, its been perfectly clear to everyone, for years now, where everything was headed. And while the facts were right there the automotive companies continued doing the same stupid crap they've been doing year after year even though they perfectly understood that it would land them knee deep in crap a few years down the road.
Again, I support Porsche in this 100% - no reason that idiots should be bailed out while those who did everything accordingly and came out on top get nothing.
InkMaster- As much as government bailouts go against having a free market in this case its the only way out!
Why? Simple really! Car companies dont make the whole car they engineer hundreds of parts from hundreds of suppliers to work together as one. If the U.S auto industry was to go out of busuness it would be chopping the head off the dog and then we'd be in some serious "shit", as you put it. The unemployment rate globally would be huge from the car company to coffee shops. For example: something as simple as sun visors are pretty much made/engineered by one company out of Texas for pretty much everyone who makes a car/truck.
There was once upon a time a car company that did make the majority of its parts and that was TVR. Where are they now? Bankrupt and owned by a holding company out of Florida.
Unfortunately this is a necessary evil and to hear Obama the other night say wealth does not trickle down is scary. Coffee shop owners have the opportunity (not that they all do) to go make millions selling coffee to "Joe Blue Collar" as he/she heads off to work at a GM/Ford/Chrysler plant.
I agree with Porsche, but only in principle, it's sad that taxpayers have to bail out a company that can't build products that people want.
BUT, if the American auto industry goes under, hundreds of towns and small cities will be devastated. Like the GM Truck Plant in Oshawa, that's causing the loss of thousands of jobs that have nothing to do with cars, restaurants and stores going under because there's no more workers to sell things to. I just hope that GM, Ford, and Chrysler get the message that they need to change things severely if they want to survive. Meanwhile, I think that our governments (America and Canada) should give incentives to foreign makers to set up shop in our countries. Jobs are jobs, it doesn't matter who is supplying them. Relying on the Americans to give everyone a job is just stupid, no matter what they're going to have to close several factories.
And as far as Porsche hiring the Japanese. Sure they got outside help, but it wasn't taxpayer money, so it's really not the same thing.
MWOW, I perfectly understand that alot of people would lose their jobs over this etc etc - I know all that. All I'm saying is that generally speaking its a stupid policy bailing out those companies who knowingly screwed up and instead of fixing their problems before they turned into "serious shit" they just continued doing what they were doing year after year.
So now the companies which did the wrong thing are getting money while the companies which understood where the market was going and acted accordingly get nothing.
Post a Comment
Sign In |