Car makers worried about new roof standards
December 31st, 1969
Car manufacturers in the US are lobbying the government to substantially change a proposal to increase the strength of car roofs, to make the rules more forgiving. Most of the manufacturers including the Big Three are facing nearly $100 million in higher annual costs for vehicle redesign over the previous 2005 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ruling and this latest change will blow-out the development costs of vehicles substantially.
The current standard has been around for almost 30 years, and the new regulations would include for the first time bigger SUVs and pickups in its criteria. Rollover crashes from such vehicles as well as passenger cars account for roughly 10,000 fatalities annually, which is equivalent to a quarter of all fatal road accidents in the US. Regulators want the standard to maintain sufficient headroom for an average sized adult male and improve roof strength by more than 50 percent to the current minimums.
Car manufacturers in the US are lobbying the government to substantially change a proposal to increase the strength of car roofs, to make the rules more forgiving. Most of the manufacturers including the Big Three are facing nearly $100 million in higher annual costs for vehicle redesign over the previous 2005 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ruling and this latest change will blow-out the development costs of vehicles substantially.
The current standard has been around for almost 30 years, and the new regulations would include for the first time bigger SUVs and pickups in its criteria. Rollover crashes from such vehicles as well as passenger cars account for roughly 10,000 fatalities annually, which is equivalent to a quarter of all fatal road accidents in the US. Regulators want the standard to maintain sufficient headroom for an average sized adult male and improve roof strength by more than 50 percent to the current minimums.
The current standard has been around for almost 30 years, and the new regulations would include for the first time bigger SUVs and pickups in its criteria. Rollover crashes from such vehicles as well as passenger cars account for roughly 10,000 fatalities annually, which is equivalent to a quarter of all fatal road accidents in the US. Regulators want the standard to maintain sufficient headroom for an average sized adult male and improve roof strength by more than 50 percent to the current minimums.
More from MotorAuthority
-
11/06/2009
Opel Boss Carl-Peter Forster Calls It Quits
Carl-Peter Forster, GM group vice president and president of Opel, will be ...
-
11/06/2009
GM Czar Lutz Heading Back To Europe--To Opel?
GM's sudden decision this week to reverse path and keep Opel rather than ...
-
11/06/2009
Toyota To Put 2010 4Runner Through The Baja 1000 Wringer
Toyota's involvement in motorsports has been a hot topic this week with ...
More from High Gear Media
-
FordReports.com | 11/09/2009
Essen 2009: Focus RS360 From Wolf Racing
In Germany, the tuner-favorite Essen Auto Show is set to begin in a ...
-
LuxuryCarReport.com | 11/09/2009
Why Does Mercury Still Exist?
I live in Canada. Ford stopped selling its Mercury brand here in 1999, ...
-
HondaReports.com | 11/09/2009
Honda's 2010 Civic Type R Mugen Edition: UK's Tuner Hatch Gets Even Better
Like a lot of cool cars in the world today, the 2010 Civic Type R is not ...



Comments (1 total)
Meet the top commenters on the LeaderboardBy JATIN #1, Posted: 12/8/2006
See? That is why I will never buy American. These people are negotiating for a measly $100 million upgrading of their vehicles for passenger safety? They would rather have people roll over and the roof cave in on the passengers? Subaru, for example, takes care of these things. Roll over in some way in a Forester (assuming you are a stupid driver) and it will retain the shape and you and your family will be safe.This matters a lot.
Post a Comment
Sign In |