Satnav beat by road map
December 31st, 1969
London played host to the first ever race between electronic navigation systems and a humble road map that was run by the UK’s Which? magazine. Reuters reports that this time, cutting-edge technology took a backseat to the simple street directory, which was found to be a more efficient and reliable form of getting from one destination to another.
Up against the road map was a Garmin Nuvi satnav, Microsoft’s Autoroute 2006 and the government's official door-to-door travel Web site Transport Direct. The car using the conventional road map took 1 hour and 35 minutes over a planned route, beating the satnav, which took an extra 8 minutes over the same journey with a time of 1 hr 45 minutes and ahead of the Autoroute, which took 1 hour and 49 minutes. The Web site directed car fared the worst, taking a total 2 hours and 19 minutes thanks to a couple of mistakes.
London played host to the first ever race between electronic navigation systems and a humble road map that was run by the UK’s Which? magazine. Reuters reports that this time, cutting-edge technology took a backseat to the simple street directory, which was found to be a more efficient and reliable form of getting from one destination to another.
Up against the road map was a Garmin Nuvi satnav, Microsoft’s Autoroute 2006 and the government's official door-to-door travel Web site Transport Direct. The car using the conventional road map took 1 hour and 35 minutes over a planned route, beating the satnav, which took an extra 8 minutes over the same journey with a time of 1 hr 45 minutes and ahead of the Autoroute, which took 1 hour and 49 minutes. The Web site directed car fared the worst, taking a total 2 hours and 19 minutes thanks to a couple of mistakes.
Up against the road map was a Garmin Nuvi satnav, Microsoft’s Autoroute 2006 and the government's official door-to-door travel Web site Transport Direct. The car using the conventional road map took 1 hour and 35 minutes over a planned route, beating the satnav, which took an extra 8 minutes over the same journey with a time of 1 hr 45 minutes and ahead of the Autoroute, which took 1 hour and 49 minutes. The Web site directed car fared the worst, taking a total 2 hours and 19 minutes thanks to a couple of mistakes.
More from MotorAuthority
-
11/09/2009
2010 BMW M3 GTS Shows Off In Pair Of New Videos
Over 400 pounds lighter, a whole lot less concerned about comfort and far, ...
-
11/09/2009
BMW Teases Next 5-Series With Kinetic Art Video
BMW's next 5-Series has been spied in testing quite a lot, including ...
-
11/09/2009
Report: Cadillac Converj Approved For Production
The off-again, on-again nature of the Cadillac Converj 's production plans ...
More from High Gear Media
-
AllCarsElectric.com | 11/09/2009
Renault to Build Their Kangoo EV at MCA
Today Renault announced that they will build the electric version of the ...
-
TheCarConnection.com | 11/09/2009
Cash-For-Clunkers Reveals Weakness Among Detroit Brands
It's obvious from the comments on this site and others in the High Gear ...
-
TheCarConnection.com | 11/09/2009
Chrysler's New Marketing Plan Aims For Refinement, Machismo
Since emerging from bankruptcy nearly five months ago, Chrysler's been ...



Comments (0 total)
Meet the top commenters on the LeaderboardPost a Comment
Sign In |