Pickups and SUVs still rate poorly in safety tests

Pickups and SUVs still rate poorly in safety tests


December 31st, 1969 More than half of the 87 SUVs and pickups tested by the US-based Insurance Institute for Highway Safety have fallen well short of optimum safety levels, with pickup trucks faring the worst. Other SUV models tested showed only modest improvements in rear-crash protection but, according to the researchers, the vehicles still have a long way to go. Problems include poor design of the seats and head restraints, which were found to provide inadequate support in most vehicles. Neck injuries are the most common ailments reported in auto crashes, accounting for 2 million insurance claims annually, reports Automotive News. Safety experts want to see less movement of the head and torso during an impact, which would require higher head restraints and stiffer seats. Vehicles are rated as being good, marginal or poor, and of the 87 SUVs and pickups tested 37 were marginal or poor with only one pickup getting a ‘good’ rating. Toyota’s Tundra was the only pickup to receive a ‘good’ rating, which also scored four-stars in the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration frontal tests. Another star performer was Ford’s new Edge (pictured above), which posted a ‘good’ rating in its first year of rear crash testing.
Pickups and SUVs still rate poorly in safety tests

Pickups and SUVs still rate poorly in safety tests

Enlarge Photo

More than half of the 87 SUVs and pickups tested by the US-based Insurance Institute for Highway Safety have fallen well short of optimum safety levels, with pickup trucks faring the worst. Other SUV models tested showed only modest improvements in rear-crash protection but, according to the researchers, the vehicles still have a long way to go.

Problems include poor design of the seats and head restraints, which were found to provide inadequate support in most vehicles. Neck injuries are the most common ailments reported in auto crashes, accounting for 2 million insurance claims annually, reports Automotive News.

Safety experts want to see less movement of the head and torso during an impact, which would require higher head restraints and stiffer seats. Vehicles are rated as being good, marginal or poor, and of the 87 SUVs and pickups tested 37 were marginal or poor with only one pickup getting a ‘good’ rating.

Toyota’s Tundra was the only pickup to receive a ‘good’ rating, which also scored four-stars in the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration frontal tests. Another star performer was Ford’s new Edge (pictured above), which posted a ‘good’ rating in its first year of rear crash testing.

Comments (1 total)

Meet the top commenters on the Leaderboard
  1. I guess Toyota couldn't buy off the government saftey test so they bought this test instead to try and save the Tundras rep.

Post a Comment

Post anonymously
Sign In |
will stay private
your 'posted by' name will link to the URL

More from MotorAuthority

More from High Gear Media

  • 2010 Toyota Yaris TheCarConnection.com  |  11/09/2009
    2010 Toyota Yaris

    2010 TOYOTA YARIS STYLING | [7 out of 10] Edmunds: "looked ...

  • 2010 Toyota Yaris TheCarConnection.com  |  11/09/2009
    2010 Toyota Yaris

    TheCarConnection.com has highlighted some of the most useful review ...

  • GM To Produce Cadillac Converj AllCarsElectric.com  |  11/09/2009
    GM To Produce Cadillac Converj

    According to a report in the Detroit News today, General Motors will forge ...