California kicked out of court in suit against car makers
December 31st, 1969
The State of California's suit, which alleged the auto makers were responsible for damaging the state with greenhouse gases that were changing the climate, was thrown out of federal district court today. As always, look forward to an appeal.
The six auto makers sued were Ford, GM, Toyota, and the North American branches of DaimlerChrysler, Honda, and Nissan. The federal District Judge, Martin Jenkins, held that even if the six auto makers did contribute to greenhouse gas pollution in the state, it would be impossible to determine to what extent, and therefore to what extent they might be responsible for climate change. And as any first-year law student will tell you, without proof of causation or damages, you have no case.
The judge went on to say it was the province of the legislature, rather than the judiciary, to determine whether auto makers are responsible for global warming.
The State of California's suit, which alleged the auto makers were responsible for damaging the state with greenhouse gases that were changing the climate, was thrown out of federal district court today. As always, look forward to an appeal.
The six auto makers sued were Ford, GM, Toyota, and the North American branches of DaimlerChrysler, Honda, and Nissan. The federal District Judge, Martin Jenkins, held that even if the six auto makers did contribute to greenhouse gas pollution in the state, it would be impossible to determine to what extent, and therefore to what extent they might be responsible for climate change. And as any first-year law student will tell you, without proof of causation or damages, you have no case.
The judge went on to say it was the province of the legislature, rather than the judiciary, to determine whether auto makers are responsible for global warming.
The six auto makers sued were Ford, GM, Toyota, and the North American branches of DaimlerChrysler, Honda, and Nissan. The federal District Judge, Martin Jenkins, held that even if the six auto makers did contribute to greenhouse gas pollution in the state, it would be impossible to determine to what extent, and therefore to what extent they might be responsible for climate change. And as any first-year law student will tell you, without proof of causation or damages, you have no case.
The judge went on to say it was the province of the legislature, rather than the judiciary, to determine whether auto makers are responsible for global warming.
More from MotorAuthority
-
11/06/2009
Opel Boss Carl-Peter Forster Calls It Quits
Carl-Peter Forster, GM group vice president and president of Opel, will be ...
-
11/06/2009
GM Czar Lutz Heading Back To Europe--To Opel?
GM's sudden decision this week to reverse path and keep Opel rather than ...
-
11/06/2009
Toyota To Put 2010 4Runner Through The Baja 1000 Wringer
Toyota's involvement in motorsports has been a hot topic this week with ...
More from High Gear Media
-
TheCarConnection.com | 11/08/2009
2010 Cadillac DTS
2010 CADILLAC DTS STYLING | [7 out of 10] Edmunds: "more-refined ...
-
TheCarConnection.com | 11/08/2009
2010 Cadillac DTS
TheCarConnection.com's editors have driven the Cadillac DTS to report on ...
-
TheCarConnection.com | 11/08/2009
2010 Cadillac STS / STS-V
2010 CADILLAC STS STYLING | [7 out of 10] Edmunds: "high-class ...



Comments (2 total)
Meet the top commenters on the LeaderboardBy Gunnar Heinrich #1, Posted: 9/17/2007
Seems like some hyper liberal prosecutor (or A.G. as the case may be) was desperate to make a name for himself. Totally bogus.
By Tiaan Nel #2, Posted: 9/19/2007
Glad someone applied some commonsense and didn’t just jump on to the global warming band wagon. In order to win a case in court you need substantial facts!
Post a Comment
Sign In |