Update: New York State blocks congestion charge
December 31st, 1969
Update: Despite passing a City Council vote earlier this month, New York’s proposed $8 congestion charged has been axed after it was voted against by state legislators yesterday. Assembly speaker Sheldon Silver in Albany announced the plan wouldn’t be taken up because it was deemed an unfair tax on middle-class commuters who are forced to drive due to inadequate public transport.
Original: Though a bargain by any Londoner's standards, the new charge will hit New Yorkers entering Manhattan where it hurts in an effort to help cut back on downtown traffic and pollution. However, the measure still has to face consideration by the New York state legislature, which has final say over the city's ability to tax motorists.
Backed by New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, the congestion charge passed a City Council vote 30-20. The proposal would tax drivers entering Manhattan south of 60th Street on weekdays between 6am and 6pm, exempting disabled drivers.
Last year a similar tax, although priced at only $4 for passenger cars, was rejected after a poll showed that 61 percent of New York City residents and nearly half of Manhattan dwellers were against the idea. Despite the resistance in the past, it seems things have changed. At a news conference following the vote Mayor Bloomberg said, "The people of New York City have spoken."
But even if the state legislature approves the measure, it will not take effect until the end of next March at the earliest. Council Speaker Christine Quinn said, "This is a bold decision... which will send a message to the state Legislature that we are sick and tired of our streets being clogged with traffic." But not all New Yorkers feel as she does. Mayor Bloomberg recognized this fact, but countered, "There will always be somebody who doesn't like things, but they will be breathing cleaner air, they will be taking mass transit, and congestion will be less."
His response hints at an underlying reason for the congestion charge: enacting it makes New York City eligible for $354 million in federal funding to finance a mass transit system upgrade that New York City's Metropolitan Transit Authority was unable to afford. It is hoped that the transit system upgrades would further alleviate gridlock and pollution in the city center.
As the trend of major cities enacting congestion charges grows, one has to wonder which city is next.
Update: Despite passing a City Council vote earlier this month, New York’s proposed $8 congestion charged has been axed after it was voted against by state legislators yesterday. Assembly speaker Sheldon Silver in Albany announced the plan wouldn’t be taken up because it was deemed an unfair tax on middle-class commuters who are forced to drive due to inadequate public transport.
Original: Though a bargain by any Londoner's standards, the new charge will hit New Yorkers entering Manhattan where it hurts in an effort to help cut back on downtown traffic and pollution. However, the measure still has to face consideration by the New York state legislature, which has final say over the city's ability to tax motorists.
Backed by New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, the congestion charge passed a City Council vote 30-20. The proposal would tax drivers entering Manhattan south of 60th Street on weekdays between 6am and 6pm, exempting disabled drivers.
Last year a similar tax, although priced at only $4 for passenger cars, was rejected after a poll showed that 61 percent of New York City residents and nearly half of Manhattan dwellers were against the idea. Despite the resistance in the past, it seems things have changed. At a news conference following the vote Mayor Bloomberg said, "The people of New York City have spoken."
But even if the state legislature approves the measure, it will not take effect until the end of next March at the earliest. Council Speaker Christine Quinn said, "This is a bold decision... which will send a message to the state Legislature that we are sick and tired of our streets being clogged with traffic." But not all New Yorkers feel as she does. Mayor Bloomberg recognized this fact, but countered, "There will always be somebody who doesn't like things, but they will be breathing cleaner air, they will be taking mass transit, and congestion will be less."
His response hints at an underlying reason for the congestion charge: enacting it makes New York City eligible for $354 million in federal funding to finance a mass transit system upgrade that New York City's Metropolitan Transit Authority was unable to afford. It is hoped that the transit system upgrades would further alleviate gridlock and pollution in the city center.
As the trend of major cities enacting congestion charges grows, one has to wonder which city is next.
Update: New York State blocks congestion charge
April 8th, 2008
Author
April 8th, 2008
Author
April 8th, 2008
- Articles Contributed: 1710
- Comments Posted: 0
- Leaderboard Rank: N/A
- 698 Views
- 11 Comments
Original: Though a bargain by any Londoner's standards, the new charge will hit New Yorkers entering Manhattan where it hurts in an effort to help cut back on downtown traffic and pollution. However, the measure still has to face consideration by the New York state legislature, which has final say over the city's ability to tax motorists.
Backed by New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, the congestion charge passed a City Council vote 30-20. The proposal would tax drivers entering Manhattan south of 60th Street on weekdays between 6am and 6pm, exempting disabled drivers.
Last year a similar tax, although priced at only $4 for passenger cars, was rejected after a poll showed that 61 percent of New York City residents and nearly half of Manhattan dwellers were against the idea. Despite the resistance in the past, it seems things have changed. At a news conference following the vote Mayor Bloomberg said, "The people of New York City have spoken."
But even if the state legislature approves the measure, it will not take effect until the end of next March at the earliest. Council Speaker Christine Quinn said, "This is a bold decision... which will send a message to the state Legislature that we are sick and tired of our streets being clogged with traffic." But not all New Yorkers feel as she does. Mayor Bloomberg recognized this fact, but countered, "There will always be somebody who doesn't like things, but they will be breathing cleaner air, they will be taking mass transit, and congestion will be less."
His response hints at an underlying reason for the congestion charge: enacting it makes New York City eligible for $354 million in federal funding to finance a mass transit system upgrade that New York City's Metropolitan Transit Authority was unable to afford. It is hoped that the transit system upgrades would further alleviate gridlock and pollution in the city center.
As the trend of major cities enacting congestion charges grows, one has to wonder which city is next.
More from MotorAuthority
-
11/09/2009
Keating Boasts 260.1 MPH Top-Speed For TKR Supercar
You may recall that we first reported about British sports car manufacturer ...
-
11/09/2009
Jaguar Launches New R Performance Academy
For some, a day at the track driving the fastest Jaguars on sale today ...
-
11/09/2009
2010 BMW M3 GTS Shows Off In Pair Of New Videos
Over 400 pounds lighter, a whole lot less concerned about comfort and far, ...
More from High Gear Media
-
AllCarsElectric.com | 11/09/2009
GM To Produce Cadillac Converj
According to a report in the Detroit News today, General Motors will forge ...
-
AllCarsElectric.com | 11/09/2009
Renault to Build Their Kangoo EV at MCA
Today Renault announced that they will build the electric version of the ...
-
AllAboutPrius.com | 11/09/2009
Toyota Creates New Flower Species To Cut CO2 From Prius Production
You may already associate the 2010 Toyota Prius with flowers, courtesy of ...
%7Cutmcsr%3D(direct)%7Cutmcmd%3D(none)%3B%2B__utmv%3D79700354.%3B)
Comments (11 total)
Meet the top commenters on the LeaderboardBy chris #1, Posted: 4/1/2008
i can hear all of the complaining already. i maintain, anyone driving a car for personal use in that area, doesn't take a second look at a 10 dollar bill fly away in the wind, let alone make the effort to retrieve it. all this will be is another drop in the bucket (or out of the bucket, i guess).
By mlevere1992 #2, Posted: 4/1/2008
How would this be enforced? What is the process for paying the congestion charge and how would they tell if you haven't paid it?
By Fritz #3, Posted: 4/1/2008
How does giving the city a bunch of money solve the congestion problem, or any other problem for that matter?
By Delby #4, Posted: 4/1/2008
They Are Prob Going To Have An 8 Dollar Charge On Williamsburg Bridge Wich Connects Western Brooklyn To Downtown Manhattan Wich Will Have More Negative Effects Than Positive , Many Business wich Function Through this area will be Be Hit Hard And The Livery And Taxi services That function Throughout these areas will becone extinct unless the paying customers are willing to absorb the fee so just another scam to get more of the taxpayers money like the article says there are underlying reasons for the charge and i quote fritz "How does giving the city a bunch of money solve the congestion problem, or any other problem for that matter? " P.S. Chris is an Idiot driving shouldnt be a priviledge for the rich everyone should be able to FREELY!!!! I.E. FreeWill
By eee #5, Posted: 4/1/2008
It's because driving is looked on as a right and not a privilege that we have Kias and Daewoos cluttering the road. What's next, Tata's $2,000 minicar? Why buy one $12,000 Pontiac when you can buy six Tatas!
By Gus #6, Posted: 4/1/2008
To the gramatically challenged Delby, you sir, are the idiot.
Read Chris' comment again extra slowly and you'll see what he is trying to say...
My only fear is that this congestion charge will spread like wildfire once it takes root...
By HECTOR #7, Posted: 4/1/2008
And so it begins... Bloodsucking parasites like Red Ken and his new accolite Michael Bloomberg are out for our money. How soon will your local parasite copy his pals in London and New York? I can only hope I die long before this highway robbery (never a better term) reaches its logical conclusion where cars are tracked by satellite and are charged by the mile.
By nyc man #8, Posted: 4/1/2008
the congestion charge will probably be paid for the same way it works in london u call they charge u. they know exactly what ur driving and everything scene it in a video. probably somekinda satilite system behind it all
By Patrick #9, Posted: 4/4/2008
This is such bullshit. They need 354 million in federal funding for a "massive transportation" overhaul?!?!? 354 million won't accomplish anything in NYC, lol.
Can't wait to get on the already overcapacity subway next year if this passes!!!
By Gus #10, Posted: 4/8/2008
Well, it didn't pass. Just goes to show that so far, people here won't put up with this c**p...
By Delby #11, Posted: 4/8/2008
nice job deffending your buddy, Gus very admirable anyways..
im glad it didnt pass as i bet many Newyorkers are as well.. at least Albany has enough sense to see how unfair of a tax to the middle class these congestion charges are....
Post a Comment
Sign In |