California willing to work with carmakers on emissions
December 31st, 1969
While the U.S. government has implemented a fleet-wide fuel efficiency standard of 35mpg by 2020 for carmakers (plus an interim mandate of 31.6mpg by 2015), California is planning to implement its own ruling of 36.8mpg by 2016. The issue has been a major headache for carmakers as California represents the single biggest market for new vehicles in the whole of North America and to make matters worse 13 other states plan to copy the stricter mandate.
Although the Bush administrations has so far blocked the strict rules set by the California Air Resources Board (CARB), all three current presidential candidates support the idea. The auto industry has publicly voiced its concern over the difficulty in meeting a 'patchwork' of regulations across the different states and even plans to meet with California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger to warn of the effects of the tougher standards.
The CARB has since responded, stating that it is open to considering a regional framework of regulations rather than a state-by-state basis, reports The Detroit News. Just what a 'regional' framework would entail is yet to be seen, but presumably it will allow the manufacturers some breathing room in attempting to meet the differing regulations.
Dave McCurdy, president and CEO of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, has stated that state-specific regulations are too difficult to conform to, and that a national approach should be undertaken. McCurdy also stated that while CARB rules were likely to come in with the election of the next president, auto manufacturers were open to using California as a testing ground for future technologies - but insisted that other than this there should be a national framework of legislation to regulate emissions.
President of CARB, Mary Nichols, has countered this by stating that the demands of the CARB rules are already within industry reach and should only require a "little creative repackaging" to achieve.
While the U.S. government has implemented a fleet-wide fuel efficiency standard of 35mpg by 2020 for carmakers (plus an interim mandate of 31.6mpg by 2015), California is planning to implement its own ruling of 36.8mpg by 2016. The issue has been a major headache for carmakers as California represents the single biggest market for new vehicles in the whole of North America and to make matters worse 13 other states plan to copy the stricter mandate.
Although the Bush administrations has so far blocked the strict rules set by the California Air Resources Board (CARB), all three current presidential candidates support the idea. The auto industry has publicly voiced its concern over the difficulty in meeting a 'patchwork' of regulations across the different states and even plans to meet with California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger to warn of the effects of the tougher standards.
The CARB has since responded, stating that it is open to considering a regional framework of regulations rather than a state-by-state basis, reports The Detroit News. Just what a 'regional' framework would entail is yet to be seen, but presumably it will allow the manufacturers some breathing room in attempting to meet the differing regulations.
Dave McCurdy, president and CEO of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, has stated that state-specific regulations are too difficult to conform to, and that a national approach should be undertaken. McCurdy also stated that while CARB rules were likely to come in with the election of the next president, auto manufacturers were open to using California as a testing ground for future technologies - but insisted that other than this there should be a national framework of legislation to regulate emissions.
President of CARB, Mary Nichols, has countered this by stating that the demands of the CARB rules are already within industry reach and should only require a "little creative repackaging" to achieve.
Although the Bush administrations has so far blocked the strict rules set by the California Air Resources Board (CARB), all three current presidential candidates support the idea. The auto industry has publicly voiced its concern over the difficulty in meeting a 'patchwork' of regulations across the different states and even plans to meet with California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger to warn of the effects of the tougher standards.
The CARB has since responded, stating that it is open to considering a regional framework of regulations rather than a state-by-state basis, reports The Detroit News. Just what a 'regional' framework would entail is yet to be seen, but presumably it will allow the manufacturers some breathing room in attempting to meet the differing regulations.
Dave McCurdy, president and CEO of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, has stated that state-specific regulations are too difficult to conform to, and that a national approach should be undertaken. McCurdy also stated that while CARB rules were likely to come in with the election of the next president, auto manufacturers were open to using California as a testing ground for future technologies - but insisted that other than this there should be a national framework of legislation to regulate emissions.
President of CARB, Mary Nichols, has countered this by stating that the demands of the CARB rules are already within industry reach and should only require a "little creative repackaging" to achieve.
More from MotorAuthority
-
11/06/2009
Opel Boss Carl-Peter Forster Calls It Quits
Carl-Peter Forster, GM group vice president and president of Opel, will be ...
-
11/06/2009
GM Czar Lutz Heading Back To Europe--To Opel?
GM's sudden decision this week to reverse path and keep Opel rather than ...
-
11/06/2009
Toyota To Put 2010 4Runner Through The Baja 1000 Wringer
Toyota's involvement in motorsports has been a hot topic this week with ...
More from High Gear Media
-
TheCarConnection.com | 11/07/2009
Driven: 2010 BMW ActiveHybrid X6
BMW's X6 "Sports Activity Coupe" is a car of contradictions. Our review ...
-
TheCarConnection.com | 11/06/2009
Opel CEO Calls It Quits, Rolls-Royce Hybrid: Today’s Car News
It’s official. The boss of Opel, Carl-Peter Forster, will be leaving ...
-
TheCarConnection.com | 11/06/2009
2010 Ford Focus
2010 FORD FOCUS STYLING | [6 out of 10] Kelley Blue Book: "Improved ...



Comments (2 total)
Meet the top commenters on the LeaderboardBy chris #1, Posted: 5/14/2008
oh wow,... unlike the last time they tried to do something like this (ban all polluting vehicles back in the 1990's) they back peddled a couple times before the whole thing disappeared.. but now they're back peddling already 8 years ahead of schedule. incredible! now THAT is progress.
By Turkle #2, Posted: 5/14/2008
I find it amazing that the "regulators" in each state are so short sighted. When California comes out with a more aggressive emmissions mandate, several states jump on the bandwagon. It is this form of "me too" one upmanship that could have killed industry in Europe if the European Union had not been formed. The states (especially) Calirussia only try to solve this issue of emissions by looking at one side of the coin. They won't limit the taxpayers right to individual transportaion (or lose the increased tax revenue that comes with it), so the only option is to regulate the car industry into oblivion.
I would love to see (pure fantasy) all of the car manufacturers simply stop shipping cars to California... stop all sales of new cars in the state. I know that all of the dealers would take a violent hit financially, and the manufacturers would also take a critical hit, but I would love to see the bottom line effect of having to build "California" only cars.
Post a Comment
Sign In |