2009 Acura TSX receives IIHS Top Safety Pick
December 31st, 1969
The new 2009 Acura TSX midsize sedan has won the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's (IIHS) Top Safety Pick award in the Institute’s latest round of testing. To qualify, a vehicle must earn the highest rating of good in the institute's front, side, and rear tests and be fitted with electronic stability control. The new TSX improved in the side test from acceptable to good and in the rear test from poor to good, compared with the previous model.
Huge improvements in protection for people in rear crashes highlight the changes incorporated in the new model. The seats and head restraints in the previous model were rated poor for occupant protection in rear crashes. Honda redesigned the seats in the 2009 TSX to earn a better rating, and when the Institute tested the new seat, it earned the highest rating of good.
The Institute’s frontal crashworthiness evaluations are based on results of 40 mph frontal offset crash tests. Each vehicle’s overall evaluation is based on measurements of intrusion into the occupant compartment, injury measures recorded on a dummy in the driver seat, and analysis of slow-motion film to assess how well the restraint system controlled dummy movement during the test.
Side evaluations are based on performance in a crash test in which the side of a vehicle is struck by a barrier moving at 31 mph. The barrier represents the front end of a pickup or SUV. Ratings reflect injury measures recorded on two instrumented dummies, assessment of head protection countermeasures, and the vehicle’s structural performance during the impact. Structural performance is based on measurements indicating the amount of B-pillar intrusion into the occupant compartment.
Rear crash protection is rated using a test that simulates a collision in which a stationary vehicle is struck in the rear at 20 mph.
The new 2009 Acura TSX midsize sedan has won the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's (IIHS) Top Safety Pick award in the Institute’s latest round of testing. To qualify, a vehicle must earn the highest rating of good in the institute's front, side, and rear tests and be fitted with electronic stability control. The new TSX improved in the side test from acceptable to good and in the rear test from poor to good, compared with the previous model.
Huge improvements in protection for people in rear crashes highlight the changes incorporated in the new model. The seats and head restraints in the previous model were rated poor for occupant protection in rear crashes. Honda redesigned the seats in the 2009 TSX to earn a better rating, and when the Institute tested the new seat, it earned the highest rating of good.
The Institute’s frontal crashworthiness evaluations are based on results of 40 mph frontal offset crash tests. Each vehicle’s overall evaluation is based on measurements of intrusion into the occupant compartment, injury measures recorded on a dummy in the driver seat, and analysis of slow-motion film to assess how well the restraint system controlled dummy movement during the test.
Side evaluations are based on performance in a crash test in which the side of a vehicle is struck by a barrier moving at 31 mph. The barrier represents the front end of a pickup or SUV. Ratings reflect injury measures recorded on two instrumented dummies, assessment of head protection countermeasures, and the vehicle’s structural performance during the impact. Structural performance is based on measurements indicating the amount of B-pillar intrusion into the occupant compartment.
Rear crash protection is rated using a test that simulates a collision in which a stationary vehicle is struck in the rear at 20 mph.
Huge improvements in protection for people in rear crashes highlight the changes incorporated in the new model. The seats and head restraints in the previous model were rated poor for occupant protection in rear crashes. Honda redesigned the seats in the 2009 TSX to earn a better rating, and when the Institute tested the new seat, it earned the highest rating of good.
The Institute’s frontal crashworthiness evaluations are based on results of 40 mph frontal offset crash tests. Each vehicle’s overall evaluation is based on measurements of intrusion into the occupant compartment, injury measures recorded on a dummy in the driver seat, and analysis of slow-motion film to assess how well the restraint system controlled dummy movement during the test.
Side evaluations are based on performance in a crash test in which the side of a vehicle is struck by a barrier moving at 31 mph. The barrier represents the front end of a pickup or SUV. Ratings reflect injury measures recorded on two instrumented dummies, assessment of head protection countermeasures, and the vehicle’s structural performance during the impact. Structural performance is based on measurements indicating the amount of B-pillar intrusion into the occupant compartment.
Rear crash protection is rated using a test that simulates a collision in which a stationary vehicle is struck in the rear at 20 mph.
More from MotorAuthority
-
11/06/2009
Opel Boss Carl-Peter Forster Calls It Quits
Carl-Peter Forster, GM group vice president and president of Opel, will be ...
-
11/06/2009
GM Czar Lutz Heading Back To Europe--To Opel?
GM's sudden decision this week to reverse path and keep Opel rather than ...
-
11/06/2009
Toyota To Put 2010 4Runner Through The Baja 1000 Wringer
Toyota's involvement in motorsports has been a hot topic this week with ...
More from High Gear Media
-
AllCarsElectric.com | 11/08/2009
LG Chem Signs Joint Venture to Supply Hyundai Mobis With Li-ion Batteries
Add another automaker to the supplier list of LG Chem as Hyundai Mobis ...
-
GreenCarReports.com | 11/07/2009
First Drive: 2010 BMW ActiveHybrid X6
"Our goal was to fundamentally change the view of hybrids ," said Peter ...
-
AllCarsElectric.com | 11/07/2009
Zero Motorcycles Announces Consumer Financing
I received the following in an email from Zero Motorcycles: "We are ...



Comments (5 total)
Meet the top commenters on the LeaderboardBy HECTOR #1, Posted: 6/23/2008
Here's a hint as to why Acuras don't sell as well as Infiniti or Lexus. Is that the face of a luxury car?
By Gus #2, Posted: 6/23/2008
Looks like the face of a Japanese Warrior Crab...
By Stewie #3, Posted: 6/24/2008
Just thought I'd point out that Acura outsells Infiniti.
2008 sales so far:
Lexus 116k
Acura 65k
Infiniti 52k
By Frank Woo #4, Posted: 8/15/2008
I own the 2009 Acura 2009 and three Mercedes'...the Acura looks pretty cool to me!
By Frank Woo #5, Posted: 8/15/2008
I own the 2009 Acura 2009 and three Mercedes'...the Acura looks pretty cool to me! My wife and I bought the car to get me from home to my practice. Neither of us is a wet behind the ears kid. We are realist driving our cars in realistic traffic...which means we get stuck in traffic and moving at 3 miles an hour in San Francisco traffic. The Acura fits our bill because it gets great fuel economy (I get 31 miles per gallon), looks great, handles very well, is RELIABLE (compared to my Mercedes') and has great toys on the inside of the cabin. If anyone out there can get what you can get in this car for what we paid for it...be my guest.
Post a Comment
Sign In |