Small trucks crash tested, results not good
December 31st, 1969
As more buyers in the market for a pickup truck eye the smaller, more fuel-efficient alternatives to the major brands' full-size offerings, the attention is beginning to reveal some unpleasant details. Safety ratings based on IIHS crash tests indicate that many of the smaller pickup trucks on the market today offer dismal impact protection.
Some of the worst offenders are the Chevrolet Colorado (pictured) and its GMC Canyon doppelganger. Absent the optional side airbags, the truck scores the lowest rating possible for side impact. Marginally better were the Dodge Dakota and Mitsubishi Raider, also without side airbags, along with the Nissan Frontier, similarly equipped. Ford's Ranger and Mazda's B-series trucks, which share a platform, also scored with this group, rating at the next-to-lowest 'marginal' level. Neither the Ford nor the Mazda even offer side airbags as an option.
Only one small pickup scored a top rank of 'good' - the Toyota Tacoma, tested with side airbags that were optional for 2008, but which become standard equipment in 2009, reports MSNBC. The other pickups tested would likely fare much better if equipped with the optional side airbags, so those in the market should not choose to skimp in that department.
Front crash ratings for the small pickup crowd are generally stronger, with the Tacoma, Dakota, Frontier and Raider all scoring the highest rating, while the Ranger, B-Series, Canyon and Colorado all managed the second-tier score of 'acceptable'.
As more buyers in the market for a pickup truck eye the smaller, more fuel-efficient alternatives to the major brands' full-size offerings, the attention is beginning to reveal some unpleasant details. Safety ratings based on IIHS crash tests indicate that many of the smaller pickup trucks on the market today offer dismal impact protection.
Some of the worst offenders are the Chevrolet Colorado (pictured) and its GMC Canyon doppelganger. Absent the optional side airbags, the truck scores the lowest rating possible for side impact. Marginally better were the Dodge Dakota and Mitsubishi Raider, also without side airbags, along with the Nissan Frontier, similarly equipped. Ford's Ranger and Mazda's B-series trucks, which share a platform, also scored with this group, rating at the next-to-lowest 'marginal' level. Neither the Ford nor the Mazda even offer side airbags as an option.
Only one small pickup scored a top rank of 'good' - the Toyota Tacoma, tested with side airbags that were optional for 2008, but which become standard equipment in 2009, reports MSNBC. The other pickups tested would likely fare much better if equipped with the optional side airbags, so those in the market should not choose to skimp in that department.
Front crash ratings for the small pickup crowd are generally stronger, with the Tacoma, Dakota, Frontier and Raider all scoring the highest rating, while the Ranger, B-Series, Canyon and Colorado all managed the second-tier score of 'acceptable'.
Some of the worst offenders are the Chevrolet Colorado (pictured) and its GMC Canyon doppelganger. Absent the optional side airbags, the truck scores the lowest rating possible for side impact. Marginally better were the Dodge Dakota and Mitsubishi Raider, also without side airbags, along with the Nissan Frontier, similarly equipped. Ford's Ranger and Mazda's B-series trucks, which share a platform, also scored with this group, rating at the next-to-lowest 'marginal' level. Neither the Ford nor the Mazda even offer side airbags as an option.
Only one small pickup scored a top rank of 'good' - the Toyota Tacoma, tested with side airbags that were optional for 2008, but which become standard equipment in 2009, reports MSNBC. The other pickups tested would likely fare much better if equipped with the optional side airbags, so those in the market should not choose to skimp in that department.
Front crash ratings for the small pickup crowd are generally stronger, with the Tacoma, Dakota, Frontier and Raider all scoring the highest rating, while the Ranger, B-Series, Canyon and Colorado all managed the second-tier score of 'acceptable'.
More from MotorAuthority
-
11/06/2009
Opel Boss Carl-Peter Forster Calls It Quits
Carl-Peter Forster, GM group vice president and president of Opel, will be ...
-
11/06/2009
GM Czar Lutz Heading Back To Europe--To Opel?
GM's sudden decision this week to reverse path and keep Opel rather than ...
-
11/06/2009
Toyota To Put 2010 4Runner Through The Baja 1000 Wringer
Toyota's involvement in motorsports has been a hot topic this week with ...
More from High Gear Media
-
AllCarsElectric.com | 11/08/2009
LG Chem Signs Joint Venture to Supply Hyundai Mobis With Li-ion Batteries
Add another automaker to the supplier list of LG Chem as Hyundai Mobis ...
-
GreenCarReports.com | 11/07/2009
First Drive: 2010 BMW ActiveHybrid X6
"Our goal was to fundamentally change the view of hybrids ," said Peter ...
-
AllCarsElectric.com | 11/07/2009
Zero Motorcycles Announces Consumer Financing
I received the following in an email from Zero Motorcycles: "We are ...



Comments (3 total)
Meet the top commenters on the LeaderboardBy Gus #1, Posted: 7/24/2008
Ok, so it's all about the airbags.
What they do is if it's an option, they test without it.
But in my opinion, being a couple of feet higher up still offers many advantages, as the primary impact force from a normal car would be lower on your body.
That's the problem with an SUV hitting a car from the side, the head of the car driver is right in line with the hood and grill of the SUV...
By Ade #2, Posted: 7/24/2008
Agree with Gus, head of driver fully exposed to side impact. That's why Volvo and a host of other manufacturers have imposed Side Impact Airbags as mandatory for their vehicles. Wish the big car manufacturers would do the same without significantly raising the car price. Safety 1st!
By Andrey #3, Posted: 7/25/2008
yeah, they need to consider safety as a top priority, i'm sure that most of the people would gladly pay a bit more just to be safe
Post a Comment
Sign In |